Skip to the content
Page 8 of 13

Grammar reminder: The Toolkit of Formal Writing

Gramatică: Scriere formală în IT. Revizuiești reguli avansate despre nomnializare, diateza pasivă și hedging. Aceste structuri oferă precizie și obiectivitate documentelor tale tehnice.

Грамматика: Официальный стиль в IT. Вы повторяете продвинутые правила номинализации, пассивного залога и смягчения утверждений. Эти структуры придают вашим техническим документам точность и объективность.

Grammar reminder: The Toolkit of Formal Writing — Writing a technology strategy

The Toolkit of Formal Writing

  • Formal technical strategy documents require absolute precision, appropriate distance, and logical flow. In this lesson, we review nominalisation, the passive voice, hedging, and cohesive devices to elevate executive-level writing.
  • Technique
  • Informal / Direct
  • Formal / Advanced
  • Nominalisation
  • We need to integrate systems quickly.
  • Rapid system integration is imperative.
  • Passive Voice
  • Our team identified a significant flaw.
  • A significant flaw was identified.
  • Hedging
  • This strategy will definitely fail.
  • This strategy would appear to carry certain risks.
  • Cohesion
  • Boston and Seattle updated their policies. The former succeeded.
  • Boston and Seattle updated their policies. The former succeeded.
  • Remember
  • Use nominalisation to transform dynamic verbs into abstract nouns, increasing information density in strategic papers.
  • Employ the passive voice to maintain objectivity and focus on systems or outcomes rather than personnel.
  • Apply hedging devices (e.g., tend to, it would seem, arguably) to soften claims and project professional caution.
  • Utilise advanced cohesive links (such as the former, respectively, or consequently) to guide the reader seamlessly across complex arguments.
  • Examples
  • Strict resource allocation was prioritised by management in Austin.
  • It could be argued that the current state harbours hidden risks.
  • The diagnostics and transition plans were reviewed in Seattle and Boston, respectively.
  • Common mistakes
  • We feel that our technology strategy is definitely the best.
  • It could be argued that our technology strategy represents a robust solution.

Complete the sentences

  • The executive board demanded the rapid (implement) ____ of the new architecture.
  • A critical capability gap (identify) ____ during the audit in Chicago.
  • It (appear) ____ that the transition plan requires revision.
  • Boston and New York deployed cloud and on-premise solutions, (respective) ____ .
  • The engineering team (tend) ____ to overlook subtle operational friction.
  • Comprehensive (diagnose) ____ preceded the target state definition.

Sources: photo by Ivan S on Pexels

Despre această lecție

Acest modul avansat de engleză pentru IT vă ajută să formulați strategii tehnologice precise și convingătoare. Veți stapâni instrumentele scrierii formale pentru a comunica eficient cu liderii din industrie.

Mai multe despre această lecție →

Об этом уроке

Этот продвинутый модуль английского языка для IT помогает формулировать точные и убедительные технологические стратегии. Вы освоите инструменты формального письма для эффективного общения с лидерами индустрии.

Подробнее об этом уроке →

Next lessons

All Advanced lessons →